STATEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

REGULAR MEETING

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2026, 9:00 AM

COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER

BOARD CHAMBER, ROOM 310

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA

TUESDAY, XX, 20XX, 9:00 AM AND WEDNESDAY, XX, 20XX, 9:00 AM

COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,

BOARD CHAMBER, ROOM 310

1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY, SAN DIEGO, CA 92101

GENERAL LEGISLATIVE SESSION

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2026, 9:00 AM

Order Of Business

REGULAR SESSION: Meeting was called to order at 9:05 a.m.

PRESENT: Supervisors Terra Lawson-Remer, Chair; Monica Montgomery Steppe, Vice-Chair;

Paloma Aguirre, Chair Pro Tem; Joel Anderson; Jim Desmond; also, Andrew Potter, Clerk of the

Board of Supervisors.

Invocation was led by Reverend Madison Shockley.

Pledge of Allegiance was led by Rick J. Espitia.

Presentations or Announcement of Proclamations and Awards:

Chair Terra Lawson-Remer presented a proclamation declaring February 10, 2026, to be

University of California, San Diego and UC San Diego Health Day throughout the County of San

Diego.

Chair Terra Lawson-Remer and Vice-Chair Monica Montgomery Steppe presented a

proclamation declaring February 10, 2026, to be Lunar New Year of the Fire Horse Day

throughout the County of San Diego.

Vice-Chair Monica Montgomery Steppe presented a proclamation declaring the Month of

February 2026, to be Black History Month throughout the County of San Diego.

Chair Pro Tem Paloma Aguirre presented a proclamation declaring February 10, 2026, to be

Diamond Brandon Day throughout the County of San Diego.

Supervisor Joel Anderson presented a proclamation declaring February 10, 2026, to be Frank

Ruffino Day throughout the County of San Diego.

Supervisor Joel Anderson and Supervisor Jim Desmond presented a proclamation declaring

February 10, 2026, to be Dayleen Colman D’liteful Chocolat Day throughout the County of San

Diego.

Supervisor Jim Desmond presented a proclamation declaring February 10, 2026, to be Wounded

Warrior Homes Day throughout the County of San Diego.

Non-Agenda Public Communication: Individuals can address the Board on topics within its

jurisdiction that are not on the agenda. According to the Board’s Rules of Procedure, each person

may speak at only one Non-Agenda Public Communication session per meeting. Speakers can

choose to speak during either the General Legislative or Land Use Legislative Session.

Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the sessions of January 27, 2026 and

January 28, 2026; and, minutes for concurrent Special District meeting of the San Diego County

Fire Protection District of December 9, 2025.

ACTION:

ON MOTION of Supervisor Aguirre, seconded by Supervisor Anderson, the Board of

Supervisors approved the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the sessions of January 27, 2026

and January 28, 2026; and, minutes for concurrent Special District meeting of the San Diego

County Fire Protection District of December 9, 2025.

AYES:

Aguirre, Anderson, Lawson-Remer, Montgomery Steppe, Desmond

Consent Agenda

Discussion Items

Board Member Committee Updates. This is an opportunity for Members of the Board to provide

informational updates on their committee assignments. No action may be taken.

Recess to Wednesday, February 11, 2026, at 9:00 AM for the Land Use Legislative Session

Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

Category

Subject

Public Safety

AUTHORIZE A-87 EXEMPTION TO COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT

TO APPROVE PUBLIC DEFENDER CONTRACT WITH PARTNERS

FOR JUSTICE AND ESTABLISH APPROPRIATIONS

(4 VOTES)

ADOPTING ORDINANCES RATIFYING THE 2026 CONSOLIDATED

FIRE CODE, REPEALING THE 2023 CONSOLIDATED FIRE CODE,

ADOPTING AND RATIFYING THE 2026 WILDLAND-URBAN

INTERFACE CODE, AND RELATED CEQA EXEMPTION (2/10/26 -

FIRST READING - 3/3/26 - SECOND READING UNLESS ORDINANCE

IS MODIFIED ON SECOND READING

(RELATES TO SAN DIEGO COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

ITEM FP01)

ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM:

SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE:

SHERIFF - ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 9 TO TITLE

2, DIVISION 1; AMENDING TITLE 2, DIVISION 1, CHAPTER 1 AND

AMENDING TITLE 2, DIVISION 1, CHAPTER 3 OF THE SAN DIEGO

COUNTY CODE OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES RELATING TO

LICENSE REQUIRED FROM THE SHERIFF, FOR-HIRE VEHICLE

DRIVERS, AND TAXICABS AND TAXICAB OPERATORS (01/28/2026

- First Reading; 02/10/2026 - Second reading unless ordinance is modified

on second reading)

Health and

Human Services

APPOINTMENT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY CHILD CARE AND

DEVELOPMENT PLANNING COUNCIL (CCDPC) MEMBERS

Financial and

General

APPOINTMENTS OF BOARD MEMBERS TO BOARDS,

COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES

Government

ADOPT AN ORDINANCE TO ADD CHAPTER 28 TO DIVISION 1 OF

TITLE 2 LICENSES, BUSINESS REGULATIONS, AND BUSINESS

TAXES OF THE COUNTY CODE OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES

RELATING TO IMPROVING SAFETY AND LABOR STANDARDS IN

COUNTY PARKS (2/10/26 - First Reading; 3/3/26 - Second Reading unless

ordinance is modified on second reading)

2025 ESCHEATMENT OF UNCLAIMED PROPERTY TAX REFUND

MONEY IN COUNTY TRUST FUNDS (PROPERTY TAX)

2025 ESCHEATMENT OF UNCLAIMED MONEY IN COUNTY TRUST

FUNDS

GENERAL SERVICES - APPROVE FIFTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE

AGREEMENT FOR THE REGIONAL AUTO THEFT TASK FORCE

10.

ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO SELL SURPLUS

REAL PROPERTY - 11.71 ACRES ON COTTONWOOD AVENUE,

SANTEE - COUNTY PARCEL NUMBER 2013-0091-A;

AUTHORIZATION TO CONDUCT PUBLIC AUCTION AT COUNTY

OPERATIONS CENTER; DIRECTION TO COMMIT USE OF EXCESS

REVENUE FROM POTENTIAL FUTURE EDGEMOOR PROPERTY

SALE TO FACILITATE DEVELOPMENT OF MISSING MIDDLE

HOUSING; AND APPROVAL OF CEQA EXEMPTION

(4 VOTES)

11.

12.

ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM:

SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE:

AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION (1/28/2026- First

Reading; 2/10/2026- Second Reading, unless the ordinance is modified on

second reading)

Appointments

APPOINTMENTS: VARIOUS

Communications 13.

Received

COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED

Financial and

General

Government

14.

15.

16.

FIGHTING THE RISING COST OF LIVING BY OPPOSING NEW

TAXES

PRESENTATION OF A SEMIQUINCENTENNIAL (250TH

ANNIVERSARY) CELEBRATION OF THE UNITED STATES

DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE AT WATERFRONT PARK

EMPLOYER AND EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION

RATES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27

Closed Session

17.

18.

CLOSED SESSION

Public

NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMUNICATION

Communication

ACTION:

ON MOTION of Supervisor Montgomery Steppe, seconded by Supervisor Aguirre, the Board of

Supervisors adopted.

AYES:

Aguirre, Anderson, Lawson-Remer, Montgomery Steppe, Desmond

SUBJECT:

AUTHORIZE A-87 EXEMPTION TO COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT

TO APPROVE PUBLIC DEFENDER CONTRACT WITH PARTNERS

FOR JUSTICE AND ESTABLISH APPROPRIATIONS (DISTRICTS:

ALL)

OVERVIEW

On February 28, 2023 (6), the San Diego County Board (Board) authorized a single source

exemption to competitive procurement for Public Defender (PD) to contract with Partners for

Justice (PFJ) for juvenile client advocate services for one year and three option years. The

contract was executed effective July 1, 2023 and embedded PFJ client advocates within the

Primary Public Defender’s Juvenile Justice Unit. On average, approximately 39 juvenile clients

and their families receive client advocate services. Services include assistance with long-term

housing resources, education support and school enrollment, job training or placement services,

benefits enrollment, medical advocacy, access to in-custody services, release planning and more.

Due to the positive results this program has achieved in the juvenile justice division, PD requests

to expand these services to its adult division, which will lead to better outcomes for clients and

their families and increase attorney efficiency.

Prior to the implementation of the program with PFJ, deputy public defenders performed these

tasks themselves. Since the implementation of PFJ’s client advocate services to PD’s juvenile

justice division, attorney time spent on support services for clients has decreased, allowing them

to focus their time more exclusively on legal work. Today’s request includes authorizing the

Director of Purchasing and Contracting to enter into a one-year contract with PFJ beginning

March 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 with three option years through 2030 to provide three

client advocates to assist PD’s adult client program and establish appropriations of $400,000

from the Opioid Settlement Fund to the Office of the Public Defender, Services & Supplies.

RECOMMENDATION(S)

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

1. In accordance with Board Policy A-87 Procedure A.3, approve and authorize the Director of

the Department of Purchasing and Contracting to enter into negotiations with Partners for

Justice and, subject to successful negotiations and a determination of a fair and reasonable

price, award contract for three client advocates to assist PD’s adult client program for up to

one year and three option periods through 2030 and an additional six months if needed, and

to amend the contract as needed to reflect changes to requirements and funding.

2. Establish appropriations of $400,000 from the Opioid Settlement Fund to the Office of the

Public Defender, Services & Supplies, for contract for client advocate services and associated

technical assistance March 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027. (4 VOTES)

EQUITY IMPACT STATEMENT

Today’s action seeks to reduce disparities across the criminal justice system by helping fulfill the

needs of the Public Defender’s (PD) indigent clients. A snapshot of the multitude and diverse

array of needs experienced by San Diegans that cycle through the legal system is presented in a

July 2025 report by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) titled “2024 Adult

Arrestee Drug Use in the San Diego Region”. Per the report, of the adult arrestees surveyed,

three in four arrestees tested positive for a substance, including one in two that tested positive for

methamphetamine. Additionally, a third of the arrestees reported a mental health diagnosis, and

over two-thirds reported having experience with being unhoused.

Client advocates will support PD clients by connecting clients to a network of local services,

community organizations, and civil attorneys. They will work with PD’s attorneys to reduce jail

time and improve case outcomes, disrupting the cycle of poverty and incarceration. By

addressing the non-legal challenges that clients face (i.e. poverty, unemployment, mental health

needs, etc.), Client advocates offer the opportunity to restore and heal individuals, engage them

with the community, help prevent repeat offenses, and promote justice, both within the legal

system and without.

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT STATEMENT

Part of the role of client advocates is to connect clients with resources to help them sustain

themselves during and after experiences with the criminal justice system, as well as to reintegrate

themselves back into the community. These resources include community-based social services

related to addiction, physical and mental health, housing, employment, education, and finance as

well as civil, family, and immigration legal resources. Client advocates will help lift barriers to

supportive services caused by limited public awareness and lack of social connectivity.

This program would support the County's Sustainability Goal of providing just and equitable

access to County services. Additionally, the program would be an investment in a chronically

underserved community and would assist in building the resilience of a vulnerable population.

Strengthening resilience is a key sustainability commitment in the County’s current Operational

Plan.

FISCAL IMPACT

If approved, this request will establish appropriations totaling $400,000 in Public Defender for

contracted client advocate services and associated technical assistance from March 1, 2026

through June 30, 2027. Current year costs, estimated at $100,000 have not been budgeted in the

Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 Operational Plan. Remaining appropriations ($300,000) to cover

option years costs for contracted services from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027will be

included in the FY 2026-28 CAO Recommended Operational Plan in the Public Defender. The

funding source will be the Opioid Settlement Fund. There will be no change in net General Fund

cost and no additional staff years.

BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT

N/A

ACTION:

ON MOTION of Supervisor Montgomery Steppe, seconded by Supervisor Aguirre, the Board of

Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent.

AYES:

Aguirre, Anderson, Lawson-Remer, Montgomery Steppe, Desmond

SUBJECT:

ADOPTING ORDINANCES RATIFYING THE 2026 CONSOLIDATED

FIRE CODE, REPEALING THE 2023 CONSOLIDATED FIRE CODE,

ADOPTING AND RATIFYING THE 2026 WILDLAND-URBAN

INTERFACE CODE, AND RELATED CEQA EXEMPTION (2/10/26 -

FIRST READING - 3/3/26 - SECOND READING UNLESS ORDINANCE

IS MODIFIED ON SECOND READING (DISTRICTS: 1, 2, AND 5)

OVERVIEW

Every three years, the State of California repeals, revises, and republishes the California Building

Code Standards Code in its entirety, and in doing so, adopts and publishes amendments to the

California Fire Code. Counties and fire protection districts may adopt the California Fire Code

by reference or establish more restrictive standards if such changes are reasonably necessary

because of local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions.

On March 14, 2023 (1), the County of San Diego (County) enacted the previous version of the

California Fire Code into the County’s Code of Regulatory Ordinances (Consolidated Fire

Code). As part of today’s proposed actions, the Board of Supervisors would repeal the existing

Consolidated Fire Code and reenact the updated Consolidated Fire Code, and the San Diego

County Fire Protection District (SDCFPD) Board of Directors would adopt the updated 2025

California Fire Code with modifications, which shall be enforced as the 2026 San Diego County

Consolidated Fire Code (2026 Consolidated Fire Code) by SDCFPD. In addition, as part of

today’s proposed actions, the SDCFPD Board of Directors would adopt the new 2025 California

Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Code with modifications, which shall be enforced as the 2026

San Diego County WUI Code (2026 WUI Code) by SDCFPD. The WUI Code includes chapters

related to the home hardening from the previous building code and defensible space from the

previous fire code.

There are 11 fire districts and one water district that provide fire services within the geographical

area of the county, including the SDCFPD. In addition to the modifications by the SDCFPD, the

2026 Consolidated Fire Code and the 2026 WUI Code contain modifications that other districts

deem necessary because of local conditions. There are 19 changes to the 2026 Consolidated Fire

Code and 22 to the 2026 WUI Code proposed by the fire marshals of the unincorporated fire

districts. The fire code standards in today’s proposed ordinances increase protection of structures

and property against wildfire-related damage and loss through progressive requirements that go

beyond those required by the State. Key changes include increasing the sizes of water tanks that

are used as an alternative to fire hydrants, increasing the size of unhabitable residential structures

that require sprinkler systems, adding home hardening requirements, and adding defensible space

enforcement requirements on one acre or less vacant properties.

The 10 other local fire districts and the one water district have already adopted the 2026

Consolidated Fire Code and the 2026 WUI Code. To take effect within the fire districts, the 2026

Consolidated Fire Code and the 2026 WUI Code must be either ratified, modified, or denied by

the Board of Supervisors. One of today’s actions is for the Board of Supervisors to ratify the

2026 Consolidated Fire Code and the 2026 WUI Code.

Today’s request is for the Board of Directors of the SDCFPD and the Board of Supervisors to

find this project exempt from CEQA and for the Board of Directors of the SDCFPD to consider

and approve ordinances adopting the 2026 Consolidated Fire Code and the 2026 WUI Code for

applicability within the SDCFPD. Today’s action would also repeal the Consolidated Fire Code

that was adopted in 2023 and request the County Board of Supervisors to consider and approve

ordinances adopting the 2026 Consolidated Fire Code and the 2026 WUI Code to the San Diego

County Code of Regulatory Ordinances and to approve ordinances ratifying the 2026

Consolidated Fire Code and the 2026 WUI Code, so they are effective within all local fire

districts. If the ordinances for the Board of Directors and the Board of Supervisors are approved

today, they will be scheduled for adoption on March 3, 2026. If any of the proposed ordinances

are altered on March 3, 2026, then on that date a subsequent meeting date will be selected for

adoption.

Acting as the Board of Directors of the San Diego County Fire Protection District:

RECOMMENDATION(S)

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION

DISTRICT

On February 10, 2026:

1. Find that the proposed actions are not projects as defined in the Public Resources Code

section 21065 and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15378,

or alternatively, exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) for

the reasons stated in the Notice of Exemption.

2. Find that the San Diego County Fire Protection Districts’ amendments to the California

Building Standards are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological, or

topographical, or topographical conditions, pursuant to Health and Safety Code section

13869.7.

3. Approve the introduction of the Ordinance (first reading), titled:

AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING THE CONSOLIDATED FIRE

CODE FOR THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

4. Approve the introduction of the Ordinance (first reading), titled:

AN ORDINANCE ENACTING THE 2026 WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE

FOR THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

If, on February 10, 2026, the Board of Directors takes the actions recommended in Items

1-4 above, then, on March 3, 2026:

1. Consider and adopt (second reading unless ordinance is modified on second reading):

AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING THE CONSOLIDATED FIRE CODE

FOR THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

2. If adopted, direct the Clerk of the Board to provide a certified copy of the adopted Ordinance

Repealing and Reenacting the Consolidated Fire Code for the San Diego County Fire

Protection District.

3. Consider and adopt (second reading unless ordinance is modified on second reading):

AN ORDINANCE ENACTING THE 2026 WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE

FOR THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

4. If adopted, direct the Clerk of the Board to provide a certified copy of the adopted Ordinance

Enacting the 2026 Wildland-Urban Interface Code for the San Diego County Fire Protection

District.

Acting as the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego:

RECOMMENDATION(S)

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

On February 10, 2026:

1. Find that the proposed actions are not projects as defined in the Public Resources Code

section 21065 and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15378,

or alternatively, exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) for

the reasons stated in the Notice of Exemption.

2. Approve the introduction of the Ordinance (first reading):

AN ORDINANCE RATIFYING THE 2026 CONSOLIDATED FIRE CODE FOR THE

UNINCORPORATED SAN DIEGO COUNTY FIRE DISTRICTS

3. Approve the introduction of the Ordinance (first reading):

AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING THE CONSOLIDATED FIRE

CODE FOR THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

4. Approve the introduction of the Ordinance (first reading):

AN ORDINANCE ENACTING THE 2026 WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE

FOR THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

5. Approve the introduction of the Ordinance (first reading):

AN ORDINANCE RATIFYING THE 2026 WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE

FOR THE UNINCORPORATED SAN DIEGO COUNTY FIRE DISTRICTS

If, on February 10, 2026, the Board of Supervisors takes the actions recommended in 1-5

above then, on March 3, 2026:

1. Consider and adopt (second reading unless ordinance is modified on second reading):

AN ORDINANCE RATIFYING THE 2026 CONSOLIDATED FIRE CODE FOR THE

UNINCORPORATED SAN DIEGO COUNTY FIRE DISTRICTS

2. Consider and adopt (second reading unless ordinance is modified on second reading):

AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING THE CONSOLIDATED FIRE

CODE FOR THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

3. Consider and adopt (second reading unless ordinance is modified on second reading):

AN ORDINANCE ENACTING THE 2026 WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE

FOR THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

4. Consider and adopt (second reading unless ordinance is modified on second reading):

AN ORDINANCE RATIFYING THE 2026 WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE

FOR THE UNINCORPORATED SAN DIEGO COUNTY FIRE DISTRICTS

5. Upon adoption, direct the Clerk of the Board to provide a certified copy of the adopted

Ordinances Ratifying the 2026 Consolidated Fire Code and the 2026 Wildland-Urban

Interface Code for the unincorporated San Diego County Fire Districts and the associated

findings to the California Department of Housing and Community Development, pursuant to

California Health and Safety Code section 13869.7(c).

EQUITY IMPACT STATEMENT

One aspect of fire prevention is ensuring fire codes are updated and clear to provide specific

direction to customers and residents. The proposed actions will provide better direction, ensuring

good customer service and equitable safety for all the residents of our county. In addition, the

San Diego County Fire Protection District (SDCFPD) recognizes the systematic impacts that

inequitable policies may create for residents of the County of San Diego. More than 80% of the

SDCFPD’s jurisdictional area qualifies as a disadvantaged unincorporated community, based on

a 2020 San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) report on funding,

administrative, and performance of the former County Service Area No. 135 (now SDCFPD).

Residents in the SDCFPD are more likely to be older, experience negative health conditions, and

live in isolated communities that are further away from a fire response. By strengthening the fire

code in our region, these actions enhance the outcomes for some of the region’s most vulnerable

residents.

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT STATEMENT

The proposed actions related to the 2026 Consolidated Fire Code and the 2026 Wildland Urban

Interface (2026 WUI) Code will contribute to the County of San Diego’s sustainability goal to

protect the health and well-being of everyone in the region and advocating for environmental

justice for communities that have been disproportionately impacted. Partnering with the other

local unincorporated fire districts to provide one fire code will support the safety and

sustainability of communities by ensuring that codes are imposed consistently to build, enhance,

and maintain resiliency.

FISCAL IMPACT

There is no fiscal impact associated with these recommendations. There will be no change in net

General Fund cost and no additional staff years.

BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT

N/A

(RELATES TO SAN DIEGO COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ITEM FP01)

ACTION:

ON MOTION of Supervisor Aguirre, seconded by Supervisor Desmond, the Board of

Supervisors took the following actions:

1. Found that the proposed actions are not projects as defined in the Public Resources Code

section 21065 and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15378, or

alternatively, exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) for the

reasons stated in the Notice of Exemption.

2. Approved the introduction of the Ordinance (first reading):

AN ORDINANCE RATIFYING THE 2026 CONSOLIDATED FIRE CODE FOR THE

UNINCORPORATED SAN DIEGO COUNTY FIRE DISTRICTS

3. Approved the introduction of the Ordinance (first reading):

AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING THE CONSOLIDATED FIRE CODE

FOR THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

4. Approved the introduction of the Ordinance (first reading):

AN ORDINANCE ENACTING THE 2026 WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE FOR

THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

5. Approved the introduction of the Ordinance (first reading):

AN ORDINANCE RATIFYING THE 2026 WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE FOR

THE UNINCORPORATED SAN DIEGO COUNTY FIRE DISTRICTS

6. Directed the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) to work with staff and County Counsel and

the stakeholder working group to return back within 90 days on the feasibility and options to

incorporate minimum workforce safety standards for BESS. Report should include the

feasibility of:

o minimum workforce safety standards for all stages of the BESS lifecycle by requiring a

certified electrician perform all electrical work involving the installation, assembly, testing,

commissioning, maintenance, repair, retrofitting, and decommissioning of a BESS facility or

Energy Storage Management System (ESMS).

o require a minimum percentage of the onsite certified electricians performing electrical work

involving the installation, assembly, testing, commissioning, maintenance, repair, retrofitting,

and decommissioning of a BESS facility or ESMS be certified in Energy Storage and Microgrid

Training and Certification (ESAMTAC).

7. Took action to further consider and adopt the Ordinances on March 3, 2026.

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT

ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM:

SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE:

SHERIFF - ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 9 TO TITLE

2, DIVISION 1; AMENDING TITLE 2, DIVISION 1, CHAPTER 1 AND

AMENDING TITLE 2, DIVISION 1, CHAPTER 3 OF THE SAN DIEGO

COUNTY CODE OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES RELATING TO

LICENSE REQUIRED FROM THE SHERIFF, FOR-HIRE VEHICLE

DRIVERS, AND TAXICABS AND TAXICAB OPERATORS (01/28/2026 -

First Reading; 02/10/2026 - Second reading unless ordinance is modified on

second reading) (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW

On January 28, 2026 (02), the Board of Supervisors took action to further consider and adopt the

Ordinance on February 10, 2026.

The San Diego County Sheriff’s Office (Sheriff’s Office) License Division currently issues all

taxicab drivers in the unincorporated San Diego County as provided by Title 2, Division 1,

Chapter 3 of the San Diego County Code.

In 1997, at the request of the Metropolitan Transit Development Board, the Sheriff’s Office

agreed to assume the responsibility for licensing drivers of jitneys, low-speed vehicles,

nonemergency medical vehicles, charters, and sightseeing vehicles in addition to taxicabs. San

Diego Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) Ordinance No. 11 was accordingly revised, and the

Sheriff’s Office began issuing all non-taxicab for-hire driver ID cards pursuant to Ordinance No.

11. However, the San Diego County Code was never revised to formalize this transfer of

responsibilities. The Sheriff’s Office began licensing for-hire vehicle drivers, except for taxicabs,

in accordance with Ordinance No. 11 while MTS maintained responsibility for the denial,

revocation or appeal. Due to a lack of authority to receive criminal history information and stated

due process concerns, MTS is not processing revocations, denials or appeals for the for-hire

drivers, raising significant public safety concerns.

Today’s item requests that the San Diego County Board of Supervisors review and approve the

introduction of an ordinance relating to for-hire vehicle drivers. The ordinance would formalize

the transfer of responsibility that took place in 1997 and provide the Sheriff’s Office with the

authority to deny, suspend, revoke, and process appeals for all for-hire vehicle drivers. This

ensures that for-hire vehicle drivers are complying with eligibility requirements designed to

protect the safety of both passengers and the public. The ordinance would also amend the

County’s taxicab regulations for consistency with the new for-hire vehicle driver ID card

regulations. The ordinance will be introduced on January 28, 2026, and, if approved, it will be

scheduled for adoption on February 10, 2026.

RECOMMENDATION(S)

SHERIFF

Consider and adopt the For-Hire Vehicle Driver Ordinance:

AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 9 TO TITLE 2, DIVISION 1; AMENDING TITLE 2,

DIVISION 1, CHAPTER 1 AND AMENDING TITLE 2, DIVISION 1, CHAPTER 3 OF THE

SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES RELATING TO

LICENSE REQUIRED FROM THE SHERIFF, FOR-HIRE VEHICLE DRIVERS, AND

TAXICABS AND TAXICAB OPERATORS.

EQUITY IMPACT STATEMENT

The proposed Ordinance will enhance public safety by ensuring that all for-hire drivers are

subject to clear and consistent standards regarding the issuance, suspension, or denial of their

licenses. Adopting the proposed Ordinance would ensure that all for-hire drivers licensed by the

Sheriff’s Office have the right to appeal in the case of a denial or revocation.

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT STATEMENT

The proposed action supports the County of San Diego’s Sustainability Goal #2 of providing just

and equitable access to County services to promote equity, transparency, and community trust.

FISCAL IMPACT

There is no fiscal impact associated with today’s request to review and approve the amended

Ordinance. There will be no change in net General Fund cost and no additional staff years.

BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT

N/A

ADVISORY BOARD STATEMENT

N/A

BACKGROUND

Prior to August 1997, it was the responsibility of the Sheriff’s Office License Division to issue,

deny, revoke and process appeals for taxicab driver ID cards, as provided by the San Diego

County Code, Title 2, Division 1, Chapter 3 “Taxicab and Taxicab Operators”. It was the

responsibility of MTS to issue, deny, revoke and process appeals for all other for-hire vehicle

driver ID cards (jitneys, low-speed vehicles, nonemergency medical vehicles, charters, and

sightseeing vehicles).

Sometime around August 1997, MTS requested the Sheriff’s Office assume responsibility for

licensing all for-hire vehicle driver ID cards. Per an August 28, 1997 letter, the Sheriff’s Office

agreed to assume the responsibility of licensing all for-hire vehicle driver ID cards. On October

30, 1997, the Metropolitan Transit Development Board, also known as MTS, amended

Ordinance No.11 with a new ordinance titled “An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 11,

Relating to Charter, Jitney, Nonemergency Medical, and Sightseeing Vehicle Driver

Identification Cards” to reflect the transfer of the entire for-hire driver card function to the

Sheriff's Office. However, the San Diego Code was never revised to formalize this transfer of

responsibilities. The Sheriff’s Office began licensing non-taxicab driver ID cards in accordance

with Ordinance No. 11, which remains current practice.

Although the Sheriff’s Office began licensing all for-hire vehicle drivers, the responsibility and

authority to deny, revoke or process an appeal for these drivers remained with MTS. The split in

responsibilities and lack of regulatory authority has created significant difficulties in enforcing

licensing eligibility standards. As part of the licensing process, the Sheriff’s Office conducts

criminal background checks of all for-hire vehicle drivers. MTS is not authorized to conduct or

review criminal background checks of individual drivers. Thus, the Sheriff’s Office conducts the

criminal background check and then forwards a recommendation to deny or revoke a driver ID

application to MTS but is unable to provide MTS with a copy of the criminal background results

or specify the relevant criminal history underlying the recommendation. MTS has expressed due

process concerns with denying, revoking or defending an appeal based on evidence that it does

not have access to. Consequently, MTS is not processing the revocations, denials or appeals for

for-hire drivers either. Despite just cause to deny or revoke a license, the Sheriff’s Office lacks

the regulatory authority to do so. This gap in oversight poses a significant risk to public safety,

particularly for passengers who utilize nonemergency medical services, and are often vulnerable

due to age or underlying health conditions. In 2025 alone, the Sheriff’s Licensing Division issued

a total of 762 taxi driver licenses and 786 for-hire driver licenses. These numbers underscore the

necessity of the Sheriff’s Office’s authority to uphold licensing standards.

Today’s action requests that the San Diego County Board of Supervisors review and approve the

introduction of an ordinance relating to for-hire vehicle drivers, providing the Sheriff’s Office

with the authority to process the entire driver ID card function (issuance, denial, revocation, and

appeal). It is also recommended that existing taxicab regulations be amended for consistency

with the proposed for-hire vehicle regulations. The amendments would establish a prohibition on

smoking or vaping inside the taxicab, updated language related to controlled substances and

alcohol screening requirement to reflect the statutory language for such testing, enhanced

grooming, appearance, and conduct standards, as well as create new grounds for suspension,

denial or revocation relating to rude and abusive language or conduct towards passengers, airport

personnel, and Inspectors. Lastly, the existing ground for denial relating to conviction for an

assault or battery within five years of the application has been expanded to include convictions

for resisting arrest, solicitation of prostitution, and any infraction, misdemeanor, or any felony or

any crime reasonable and rationally related to the for-hire industry. The recommended changes to

the taxicab and for-hire vehicle regulations will not affect the rideshare industry as rideshare

services are regulated by the California State Public Utilities Commission. The ordinance will be

introduced on January 28, 2026, and, if approved, it will be scheduled for adoption on February

10, 2026.

LINKAGE TO THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO STRATEGIC PLAN

Today’s proposed actions support the Equity and Justice Strategic Initiatives of the County of

San Diego 2026-2031 Strategic Plan and aligns with the objective of ensuring fair, just, and

equitable licensing for for-hire drivers and supporting the safety of County resident and visitors

serviced by for-hire drivers.

Respectfully submitted,

ACTION:

ON MOTION of Supervisor Montgomery Steppe, seconded by Supervisor Aguirre, the Board of

Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Ordinance No. 10972 (N.S.),

entitled: AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 9 TO TITLE 2, DIVISION 1; AMENDING

TITLE 2, DIVISION 1, CHAPTER 1 AND AMENDING TITLE 2, DIVISION 1, CHAPTER 3

OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES RELATING TO

LICENSE REQUIRED FROM THE SHERIFF, FOR-HIRE VEHICLE DRIVERS, AND

TAXICABS AND TAXICAB OPERATORS.

SUBJECT:

APPOINTMENT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY CHILD CARE AND

DEVELOPMENT PLANNING COUNCIL (CCDPC) MEMBERS

(DISTRICT: ALL)

OVERVIEW

The San Diego County Child Care and Development Planning Council (CCDPC) is advisory to

the San Diego County Board of Supervisors (Board) and the San Diego County Superintendent

of Schools to advise the State on local child care and needs. The San Diego County CCDPC is a

statutory body for all counties per Assembly Bill (AB) 131 and Welfare and Institutions Code,

Child Care and Development Services Act [10207 - 10490], and Chapter 31 Local Planning

Councils [10480 - 10487]. The San Diego County Superintendent of Schools approved the San

Diego County CCDPC Membership Roster on November 21, 2025.

Today’s action requests the Board appoint nine new members and reappoint eight members to

the San Diego County CCDPC and approve the San Diego County CCDPC Membership Roster

for 2026.

Today's action supports the County of San Diego vision of a just, sustainable, and resilient future

for all, specifically those communities and populations in San Diego County that have been

historically left behind, as well as our ongoing commitment to the regional Live Well San Diego

vision of healthy, safe, and thriving communities. This will be accomplished by continuing

services that assist San Diego County families with their diverse child care needs and improving

access to quality child care and early education programs, which promote a healthy, safe and

thriving region.

RECOMMENDATION(S)

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

1. Appoint nine new members to the San Diego County Child Care and Development

Planning Council (CCDPC) to serve a two-year term, set to expire December 31, 2027.

2. Reappoint eight members to the San Diego County CCDPC, whose term ended on

December 31, 2025, to serve another two-year term, set to expire December 31, 2027.

3. Approve the San Diego County CCDPC Membership Roster for 2026 and authorize the

Clerk of the Board to certify the membership composition as required by the California

Department of Social Services (Attachment A and B).

EQUITY IMPACT STATEMENT

The San Diego County Child Care and Development Planning Council (CCDPC) membership

roster recommendations are made with a good faith effort to appoint members ensuring that the

ethnic, racial and geographic composition of the San Diego County CCDPC is reflective of the

population of the county. The membership list for the 2026 year will be compromised of 16%

Black or African American, 44% Hispanic, 4% Asian or Pacific Islander, 56% White

(non-Hispanic), and 4% Native American. This demographic closely resembles the

demographics of San Diego County (Attachment B).

The San Diego County CCDPC assesses the child care and child development needs of San

Diego County children and develops a Child Care Plan to address those needs. The Child Care

Plan provides recommendations gathered through community engagement solicited during San

Diego County CCDPC meetings. San Diego County CCDPC members conduct outreach in the

community with a focus on engaging areas of the community with the highest need. Outreach is

conducted throughout the year with a strong emphasis done in March through May of each year

to solicit new members.

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT STATEMENT

Today’s proposed actions support the County of San Diego Sustainability Goal #2 to provide just

and equitable access by providing the building blocks to create a more equitable, accountable,

accessible, and affordable child care system that meets the needs of San Diego County families.

FISCAL IMPACT

There is no fiscal impact associated with these recommendations. There will be no change in net

General Fund costs and no additional staff years.

BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT

N/A

ACTION:

ON MOTION of Supervisor Montgomery Steppe, seconded by Supervisor Aguirre, the Board of

Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent.

AYES:

Aguirre, Anderson, Lawson-Remer, Montgomery Steppe, Desmond

SUBJECT:

APPOINTMENTS OF BOARD MEMBERS TO BOARDS,

COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW

The Board of Supervisors annually appoints Board Members to the boards, commissions and

committees listed in Attachment A.

RECOMMENDATION(S)

CHAIR TERRA LAWSON-REMER

1. Appoint members of the Board of Supervisors to boards, commissions and committees as

proposed in Attachment A.

2. Appoint Matthew Parr, Director, Office of Economic Development and Government

Affairs, as the second alternate member on the Urban Counties of California.

EQUITY IMPACT STATEMENT

Annually, the Board of Supervisors must appoint members of the Board to serve on boards,

commissions, and committees. This ensures that the County has a voice on regional boards and

commissions for opportunities to maximize resources to benefit the region.

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT STATEMENT

The proposed appointments allow stakeholders to plan for community engagement and identify

meaningful ways to continually seek input to foster inclusive and sustainable communities.

FISCAL IMPACT

There is no fiscal impact associated with these recommendations. There will be no change to net

General Fund cost and no additional staff years.

BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT

There is no business impact associated with this action.

ACTION:

ON MOTION of Supervisor Montgomery Steppe, seconded by Supervisor Aguirre, the Board of

Supervisors took action as recommended and adopted the following list of appointments to

boards, commissions, and committees, on Consent.

AYES:

Aguirre, Anderson, Lawson-Remer, Montgomery Steppe, Desmond

SUBJECT:

ADOPT AN ORDINANCE TO ADD CHAPTER 28 TO DIVISION 1 OF

TITLE 2 LICENSES, BUSINESS REGULATIONS, AND BUSINESS

TAXES OF THE COUNTY CODE OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES

RELATING TO IMPROVING SAFETY AND LABOR STANDARDS IN

COUNTY PARKS (2/10/26 - First Reading; 3/3/26 - Second Reading unless

ordinance is modified on second reading) (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW

On November 3, 2021 (05), the County of San Diego (County) Board of Supervisors (Board)

adopted a Resolution requiring the County Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) through

existing reservation and event agreements, to ensure that all entertainment vendors at DPR

facilities have completed the Entertainment Technician Certification Program (ETCP) and a

10-hour Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) safety awareness course or

equivalent. Subsequently, on October 21, 2025 (21), the Board directed the Chief Administrative

Officer (CAO) to explore the feasibility of establishing a local labor enforcement mechanism for

higher impact events held on County-owned and leased park property, to support implementation

and compliance with Board adopted labor standards, including minimum wage requirements, and

to return to the Board within 120 days with a draft ordinance, through the Office of Labor

Standards and Enforcement (OLSE).

This action is in response to a national trend in which large-scale commercial events held on

public property generate economic activity but may also present heightened safety and labor

compliance risks. Temporary and subcontracted workers, stagehands, and production crews often

work in fast-paced environments with limited oversight. Without local enforcement, violations

such as unpaid wages and unsafe conditions can go unaddressed, risking the safety and

well-being of workers and attendees.

In partnership with organizations supporting entertainment professionals, OLSE identified

measures the County could implement to ensure events held on County-owned and leased park

property reflect the County’s values, promote safe workplaces, and ensure responsible

management of public spaces. The proposed ordinance establishes enforceable labor standards

for high-impact events, including a $25 minimum hourly wage for entertainment workers with

annual cost-of-living adjustments based on state minimum wage increases. These requirements

apply to technicians, stagehands, and other event-based workers engaged directly through

subcontractors to perform setup, operation, or teardown of production elements such as staging,

lighting, and sound as set forth by California State Labor Code Division 5, Part 14, Section 9251

This ordinance would also authorize OLSE to investigate complaints, issue penalties, and

promote compliance through education and outreach. Additionally, it establishes a dedicated

staff position to ensure consistent enforcement and coordination between OLSE and DPR.

Today’s request is for the Board to approve the introduction of an ordinance adding Chapter 28

to Division 1 of Title 2 Licenses, Business Regulations, and Business Taxes of the County Code

of Regulatory Ordinances, establishing clear safety and labor standards for entertainment and live

events on County-owned and leased park property. If approved, the ordinance will be scheduled

for adoption on March 03, 2026. If the proposed ordinance is modified on February 10, 2026,

then, on that date, a subsequent meeting date will be selected for the ordinance’s adoption.

RECOMMENDATION(S)

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

On February 10, 2026:

1. Consider the recommendation to approve the introduction of the Ordinance (first

reading):

ADOPT AN ORDINANCE TO ADD CHAPTER 28 TO DIVISION 1 OF TITLE 2

LICENSES, BUSINESS REGULATIONS, AND BUSINESS TAXES OF THE

COUNTY CODE OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES RELATING TO IMPROVING

SAFETY AND LABOR STANDARDS IN COUNTY PARKS

If, on February 10, 2026, the Board takes action as recommended on item #1 above, then on

March 03, 2026:

1. Consider and adopt the Ordinance (second reading):

ADOPT AN ORDINANCE TO ADD CHAPTER 28 TO DIVISION 1 OF TITLE 2

LICENSES, BUSINESS REGULATIONS, AND BUSINESS TAXES OF THE

COUNTY CODE OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES RELATING TO IMPROVING

SAFETY AND LABOR STANDARDS IN COUNTY PARKS

2. If the Board acts on Recommendation #1 above:

a. Refer to Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-27 budget deliberations the establishment of

appropriations of $165,000 in the Chief Administrative Office, Office of Labor

Standards and Enforcement for one staff year (1.0 FTE) for administering and

enforcing safety and labor standards at County-owned and leased park facilities

based on General Purpose Revenue. Active enforcement of the ordinance and

program implementation will be contingent upon the successful addition of the

position in the Operational Plan.

3. Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to report back on the status of the Improving

Safety and Labor Standards in County Parks Program established in the Office of Labor

Standards and Enforcement, including development of regulations on how funds will be

collected if penalties are administered.

EQUITY IMPACT STATEMENT

Improving safety and labor standards in County parks directly advances the County’s

commitment to equity, inclusion, and worker well-being. By setting clear minimum labor

standards and requiring compliance with established safety practices, the proposed ordinance

promotes equitable treatment across all event workers, regardless of employment status or

employer type.

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT STATEMENT

This action strengthens the long-term sustainability of the region’s live events ecosystem by

promoting responsible labor practices, community safety, and operational integrity within

County-owned and leased park property. Sustainable governance is not only environmental but

also includes ensuring that economic systems and workplaces function safely and equitably over

time. By embedding fair labor standards and safety requirements into the administration of

County-owned and leased park property, the County helps create a self-sustaining model in

which event organizers, vendors, and workers all benefit from predictable expectations and

reduced risks. These measures contribute to a stable, skilled, and safety-conscious workforce,

decreasing turnover and supporting the resilience of both the local events industry and the

broader community that depends on it.

FISCAL IMPACT

There is no fiscal impact for FY 2025-26. If Recommendation 2a is approved on March 3, 2026,

there will be ongoing costs and revenue of approximately $165,000 that will be referred to FY

2026-27 budget deliberations in the Chief Administrative Office, Office of Labor Standards and

Enforcement for one staff year for administering and enforcing safety and labor standards at

County-owned and leased park facilities based on General Purpose Revenue. For the Department

of Parks and Recreation, any decrease in special events could provide less revenue and

potentially impact park operations and programming.

BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT

Today’s action establishes equitable standards for entertainment event vendors, and discourages

unfair competition from low-road employers by setting clear and consistent safety and labor

standards for County-owned and leased park properties. These standards promote responsible

business practices that protect workers and ensure that all contractors operate under equitable

conditions. By establishing a more predictable and transparent operating environment, the

ordinance helps retain more of the economic impact generated from events on County-owned

and leased park property within the local economy, supporting good jobs, fair wages, and a

skilled entertainment workforce. In doing so, the County strengthens the regional events industry,

fosters high-quality vendor performance, and reinforces its role as a fair and accountable public

partner to the business community.

ACTION:

ON MOTION of Supervisor Montgomery Steppe, seconded by Supervisor Aguirre, the Board of

Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent, and took action to further consider and

adopt the Ordinance on March 3, 2026.

AYES:

NOES:

Aguirre, Anderson, Lawson-Remer, Montgomery Steppe

Desmond

SUBJECT:

2025 ESCHEATMENT OF UNCLAIMED PROPERTY TAX REFUND

MONEY IN COUNTY TRUST FUNDS (PROPERTY TAX) (DISTRICTS:

ALL)

OVERVIEW

This is a request to approve the escheatment of unclaimed property tax refunds pursuant to

section 5102 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code.

RECOMMENDATION(S)

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

Approve the escheatment of unclaimed property tax refunds and direct the Chief Administrative

Officer through the Auditor and Controller to transfer $313,012.66 from the Treasurer-Tax

Collector trust funds and deposit in the County General Fund.

EQUITY IMPACT STATEMENT

The Treasurer-Tax Collector recognizes the systemic impacts that inequitable policies may create

for residents of the County of San Diego. Impacts have historically included outcomes related to

racial justice and issues of belonging that are reflected in the programs, services and resources

allocated to communities. The Treasurer-Tax Collector has provided widespread public notice

that these property tax refunds are available to claim by displaying a full list of items on its

website for the past four years, and by placing display ads in local community news publications

throughout the County as means to notify the public of the upcoming deadline to claim refunds

before they are escheated. The notices and display ads utilize plain language and graphics to

convey the message and action that is needed to claim a refund. Concurrent to these efforts staff

perform extensive research and make attempts to contact the rightful owner of the refund and

encourage a claim be submitted. It is anticipated that these actions have a positive impact on

groups including Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC), women, people with disabilities,

immigrants, youth, and the LGBTQ+ community

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT STATEMENT

The proposed actions to escheat unclaimed refunds and return the revenue to the County of San

Diego’s (County) General Fund are appropriate as they support the County’s Strategic Initiative

of Sustainability to align the County’s available resources with services to maintain fiscal

stability and ensure long-term solvency. The proposed actions to escheat revenue is in alignment

with the Countys Sustainability Goal of providing just and equitable access as the process to

claim refunds is widely accessible to all claimants.

FISCAL IMPACT

If approved, this request will result in $313,012.66 of unanticipated revenue to the General Fund.

There will be no change in net General Fund cost and no additional staff years.

BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT

N/A

ACTION:

ON MOTION of Supervisor Anderson, seconded by Supervisor Aguirre, the Board of

Supervisors approved the escheatment of unclaimed property tax refunds and directed the Chief

Administrative Officer through the Auditor and Controller to transfer $313,012.66 from the

Treasurer-Tax Collector trust funds to the General Fund and establish appropriations in the

Health & Human Services Agency to be used towards shallow rent subsidy program.

AYES:

NOES:

Aguirre, Anderson, Montgomery Steppe, Desmond

Lawson-Remer

SUBJECT:

2025 ESCHEATMENT OF UNCLAIMED MONEY IN COUNTY TRUST

FUNDS (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW

This is a request to approve the escheatment of specified unclaimed funds pursuant to California

Government Code sections 50050-50057 and Penal Code sections 1420-1422. Public notice has

been given by the Treasurer-Tax Collector that 1) the amount of $278,465.43 was deposited in

Trust Funds in the Treasury of San Diego, 2) was not the property of the County of San Diego

(County), 3) has remained unclaimed for the requisite years, and 4) will become property of the

local agency effective October 7, 2025, if no claim is received prior to that date. The final claim

period ended on October 6, 2025.

RECOMMENDATION(S)

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

1. Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to transfer total of $242,802.54 from County Trust

Funds from identified County Departments and deposit it as revenue in the County’s General

Fund.

2. Direct the Chief Administrative Officer through the Office of Revenue and Recovery to

transfer a total of $35,662.89 from its Trust Funds and deposit it as revenue in the Office of

Revenue and Recovery’s Victim Services Fund

EQUITY IMPACT STATEMENT

The Treasurer-Tax Collector recognizes the systemic impacts that inequitable policies may create

for residents of the County of San Diego. Impacts have historically included outcomes related to

racial justice and issues of belonging that are reflected in the programs, services and resources

allocated to communities. County departments submit a list of unclaimed monies in their

possession to the Treasurer-Tax Collector for inclusion in the Treasurer-Tax Collection

escheatment noticing and advertising activity. The Treasurer-Tax Collector provides widespread

public notice that these unclaimed monies are available to claim by displaying a full list of items

on the Treasurer-Tax Collector website, and by placing display ads in local community news

publications throughout the County as means to notify the public of the upcoming deadline to

claim the monies before they are escheated. The notices and display ads utilize “plain language”

and graphics to convey the message and action that is needed to make a claim. Concurrent to

these efforts staff perform extensive research and make attempts to contact the rightful owner of

the money and encourage a claim to be submitted. It is anticipated that these actions have a

positive impact on groups to include Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC), women,

people with disabilities, immigrants, youth, and the LGBTQ+ community.

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT STATEMENT

The proposed actions to escheat unclaimed refunds and return the revenue to the County of San

Diego (County) General Fund are appropriate as they support the County’s Strategic Initiative of

Sustainability and the Goal of Economy, to align the County’s available resources with services

to maintain fiscal stability and ensure long-term solvency. The proposed actions to escheat

revenue are also in alignment with the County’s Sustainability Goal of providing just and

equitable access as the process to claim refunds is widely accessible to all claimants.

FISCAL IMPACT

If approved, this request will result in $242,802.54 of unanticipated revenue to be realized by the

County of San Diego’s General Fund and $35,662.89 by the Office of Revenue and Recovery

Victim Services Fund. There will be no change in net General Fund costs and no additional staff

years.

BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT

N/A

ACTION:

ON MOTION of Supervisor Montgomery Steppe, seconded by Supervisor Aguirre, the Board of

Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent.

SUBJECT:

GENERAL SERVICES - APPROVE FIFTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE

AGREEMENT FOR THE REGIONAL AUTO THEFT TASK FORCE

(DISTRICT: 2)

OVERVIEW

The San Diego County Regional Auto Theft Task Force (RATT) is a multi-agency task force that

investigates and prosecutes vehicle theft in the San Diego Region. The County of San Diego

(County) is the financial administrator for the task force. On June 2, 1992 (20), the Board of

Supervisors (Board) approved the initial lease for office space for RATT.

On August 6, 2019 (17), the Board authorized a site search for a new location as the current

facility no longer met the operational requirements of RATT. A space validation conducted by

the Department of General Services (DGS) supported a need of up to 21,500 square feet. DGS

negotiated a short-term lease extension to allow RATT time to search for space that better suited

its programmatic needs. The current facility no longer meets the operational requirements

necessary to accommodate the current staffing needs. The County identified a facility owned by

the current lessor’s affiliate that meets RATT’s requirements. The initial lease expired on April

30, 2025, and is currently on holdover, which has allowed RATT to continue its occupancy on a

month-to-month basis while a relocation amendment was negotiated.

Staff from DGS have negotiated a fifth amendment to the lease agreement that will relocate

RATT to a new facility and extend the term by ten years, with one five-year option to further

extend the term. The proposed amendment also includes an expansion of 718 square feet.

Today’s request is for Board approval of the fifth amendment to the lease agreement, which will

allow RATT to relocate to a new facility.

RECOMMENDATION(S)

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

1. Find the proposed lease for the San Diego County Regional Auto Theft Task Force is exempt

from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA

Guidelines Section 15301.

2. Approve and authorize the Director, Department of General Services, to execute the

proposed lease amendment for the new premises located in San Diego.

EQUITY IMPACT STATEMENT

The San Diego County Regional Auto Theft Task Force supports the community in its current

location. Extending the term of the lease would benefit the community by continuing to provide

resources. A larger facility increases the availability of adequate programs and resources ensuring

the community has equitable access to law enforcement resources.

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT STATEMENT

Implementing effective sustainability objectives is crucial to ensuring safe and healthy

communities and contributing to the overall success of the region. The approval of this lease

amendment supports the County’s Strategic Initiative of Sustainability to ensure the capability to

respond to immediate needs for individuals, families, and the region.

FISCAL IMPACT

Funds for this request are included in the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Operational Plan for San Diego

County District Attorney (DA). If approved, this request will result in estimated costs and

revenue of approximately $94,500 in Fiscal Year 2025-26 based on an estimated amendment

commencement of April 1, 2026. Fiscal Year 2026-27 costs are estimated at $381,308, which

includes a 3.5% rent adjustment to go into effect April 1, 2027. Funds for the remaining contract

term and for each option year (if exercised) will be included in future years’ operational plans for

DA. The funding source is fees collected pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 9250.14.

There will be no additional staff years.

BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT

N/A

ACTION:

ON MOTION of Supervisor Montgomery Steppe, seconded by Supervisor Aguirre, the Board of

Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent.

AYES:

Aguirre, Anderson, Lawson-Remer, Montgomery Steppe, Desmond

10.

SUBJECT:

ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO SELL SURPLUS

REAL PROPERTY - 11.71 ACRES ON COTTONWOOD AVENUE,

SANTEE

COUNTY

PARCEL

NUMBER

2013-0091-A;

AUTHORIZATION TO CONDUCT PUBLIC AUCTION AT COUNTY

OPERATIONS CENTER; DIRECTION TO COMMIT USE OF EXCESS

REVENUE FROM POTENTIAL FUTURE EDGEMOOR PROPERTY

SALE TO FACILITATE DEVELOPMENT OF MISSING MIDDLE

HOUSING; AND APPROVAL OF CEQA EXEMPTION (DISTRICT: 2)

OVERVIEW

On December 3, 2013 (18), the Board of Supervisors (Board) declared County of San Diego

(County) Parcel Number 2013-0091-A (Property 1) surplus to County needs. Property 1 is further

identified as Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 381-051-17 and consists of approximately 11.71

acres of vacant land located immediately south of the Edgemoor Skilled Nursing Facility. In

November 2016, the County issued a Notice of Availability (NOA) per State of California

Surplus Land Act (SLA) and attempted to sell the property twice to repay the Edgemoor

Development Fund, per Board Policy F-38, Edgemoor Property Development (Board Policy

F-38).

On August 1, 2024, the County issued the NOA as required by SLA to local public entities, as

defined by Section 50079 of the Health and Safety Code, that have jurisdiction over the surplus

land. The NOA was also sent to California Housing Finance Agency Certified Housing

Sponsors, as defined by Section 50074 of the Health and Safety Code, that have notified the

California Department of Housing and Community Development of their interest in surplus land

for affordable housing development. In accordance with SLA, interested parties were given 60

days to respond to the NOA. The County did not receive interest from any public entities, but did

receive proposals from three housing sponsors, and entered into a good faith negotiation period

with the selected developer as required by SLA. However, the County and the selected developer

could not agree on mutually satisfactory terms for the sale.

Today’s request is for Board authority to take the actions necessary to sell Property 1 to the

highest bidder in accordance with California Government Code Sections 25520 et seq. If the

Board takes the actions recommended on February 10, 2026, then on March 20, 2026, the

Director of General Services, or designee, will conduct the bid openings for the sale of Property

1, open sealed bids from bidders, open the floor for oral bids, select the highest responsible

bidder, and return to the Board at a later date for the final acceptance of the selected bid and

approval of the sale. As permitted by California Government Code Section 25527, if the winning

bidder is represented by a licensed real estate broker, a commission equal to two percent of the

sale price will be paid to the broker from the sale proceeds. In addition, as required by Section

54233 of the California Government Code, County will record a restrictive covenant against

Property 1. This covenant will state if 10 or more residential units are developed on the property,

then at least 15% of the total units shall be rented or sold at affordable housing cost or affordable

rent to lower income households, as defined in Section 54233. The minimum bid for Property 1

is $15,000,000, representing an as-is value based on an appraisal addendum dated August 23,

2025. Pursuant to Board Policy F-38, the net proceeds from the sale of the property will be

deposited to the Edgemoor Development Fund.

RECOMMENDATION(S)

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

1. Find that the proposed actions are exempt from review under the California

Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15312

as it is the sale of surplus government property that is not located in an area of statewide,

regional, or areawide concern identified in Section 15206(b)(4) of the State CEQA

Guidelines.

2. Approve and adopt the Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO SELL

REAL PROPERTY AND NOTICE INVITING BIDS FOR REAL PROPERTY

NUMBER 2013-0091-A. (4 VOTES)

3. Direct the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors (Board) to post the adopted Resolution and

advertise the County’s Notice of the Adoption of the Resolution of Intention to Sell Real

Property Number 2013-0091-A in accordance with the Government Code Sections 25528

and 6063.

4. Authorize the Director, Department of General Services, or designee, to conduct the bid

opening and select the highest responsible bidder for Real Property Number 2013-0091-A

on March 20, 2026 and return to the Board for the final approval of the highest bidder.

5. Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to commit use of excess revenue from the

potential future sale of a portion of the Edgemoor Remainder Parcel (APN 381-050-81)

after payment of outstanding debt service to facilitate the development of Missing Middle

housing in San Diego County and return to the Board to appropriate the excess revenue.

EQUITY IMPACT STATEMENT

Parcel Number 2013-0091-A (Property 1) is among 25 sites in the City of Santee (City) that were

recently rezoned to reduce the residential density and could support the development of the

moderate-income category of housing. It is anticipated that the approval of today’s

recommendations will increase housing production that meets the needs of the community in the

City. As required by Surplus Land Act (SLA) Government Code Section 54222.5 and California

Department of Housing and Community Development, the County will record a restrictive

covenant against Property 1 at the time of sale, which states that if 10 or more residential units

are developed on Property 1, then at least 15% of the total number of units developed on the

property shall be sold or rented as affordable housing. The revenue resulting from the sale of

Property 1 will be deposited to the Edgemoor Development Fund and used to support annual

debt service for the Edgemoor Skilled Nursing Facility.

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT STATEMENT

Today’s proposed action contributes to the County of San Diego’s Sustainability Goal No. 1 to

engage the community to partner and participate in decisions that impact communities and Goal

No. 2 to provide just and equitable access to develop land for housing needs.

FISCAL IMPACT

Funds for this request are included in the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Operational Plan in the

Department of General Services (DGS). If approved, today’s requests will result in costs and

revenue of $220,000 in Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26, which includes DGS staff costs of $60,000 for

sale of Property 1, ongoing homeless encampment cleanup efforts of $60,000 on the Edgemoor

properties, $80,000 for pre-planning efforts such as survey work, appraisal and staff time to

prepare for a future Board request to declare a portion of the Remainder Parcel surplus, and

$20,000 to support the identification of how excess revenue can be used to develop of Missing

Middle housing and report back. The funding source is Edgemoor Development Fund revenue.

If the sale of Parcel Number 2013-0091-A (Property 1) is completed, this will result in revenue

of $15,000,000 anticipated in FY 2026-27. Pursuant to Board Policy F-38, Edgemoor Property

Development (Board Policy F-38), the net proceeds from the sale of the property will be

deposited to the Edgemoor Development Fund to support the annual debt service for the

Edgemoor Skilled Nursing Facility. Per Board Policy F-38 revenue generated in excess of debt

service payments, can be used to pay for costs associated with management, maintenance or

marketing of the Edgemoor property. Based on Recommendation 5, alternative uses to fund

Missing Middle housing will be identified. There will be no change in net General Fund cost and

no additional staff years.

BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT

N/A

ACTION:

ON MOTION of Supervisor Montgomery Steppe, seconded by Supervisor Aguirre, the Board of

Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Resolution No. 26-011, entitled:

RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO SELL REAL PROPERTY AND NOTICE INVITING

BIDS FOR REAL PROPERTY NUMBER 2013-0091-A.

AYES:

Aguirre, Anderson, Lawson-Remer, Montgomery Steppe, Desmond

11.

SUBJECT:

AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION (1/28/2026- First

Reading; 2/10/2026- Second Reading, unless the ordinance is modified on

second reading) (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW

On January 28, 2026 (11), the Board of Supervisors took action to further consider and adopt the

Ordinance on February 10, 2026.

The Compensation Ordinance, enacted by the Board of Supervisors, establishes procedures for

compensating County of San Diego employees. The Department of Human Resources

recommends updates based on organizational needs to attract and retain a skilled, adaptable, and

diverse workforce. Today’s proposed amendments support this goal.

Today’s recommendations are for the Board to approve the introduction of the amendments to

the Compensation Ordinance (first reading). If the Board takes action as recommended, then on

February 10, 2026, staff recommends the Board adopt the ordinance (second reading). If the

proposed ordinance is altered on February 10, 2026, then on that date a subsequent meeting date

will be selected for the adoption of the ordinances.

RECOMMENDATION(S)

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

Approve the adoption of the Ordinances (second reading):

AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION

If the proposed ordinance(s) are altered on February 10, 2026, then on that date a subsequent

meeting date will be selected for adoption of the ordinance(s).

EQUITY IMPACT STATEMENT

The Department of Human Resources is committed to ensuring equity in classification and

compensation. Today’s recommended amendments to the Compensation Ordinance will help the

County of San Diego attract, retain, and support a skilled, adaptable, and diverse workforce,

enabling the delivery of efficient, high-quality services to residents and visitors.

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT STATEMENT

The proposed amendments to the Compensation Ordinance support the County of San Diego’s

Sustainability Goals by promoting sustainable economic growth through just and equitable

wages and benefits.

FISCAL IMPACT

There is no fiscal impact associated with these recommendations. There will be no change in net

General Fund cost and no additional staff years.

BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT

N/A

ACTION:

ON MOTION of Supervisor Montgomery Steppe, seconded by Supervisor Aguirre, the Board of

Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Ordinance No. 10973 (N.S.),

entitled: AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION.

AYES:

Aguirre, Anderson, Lawson-Remer, Montgomery Steppe, Desmond

12.

SUBJECT:

APPOINTMENTS: VARIOUS (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW

These appointments are in accordance with applicable Board Policy A-74, “Citizen Participation

in County Boards, Commissions and Committees,” Board Policy A-77, “Appointments to Fill

Vacancies and Cancellation of Election where Insufficient Nominations Filed Prior to Uniform

District Election and Citizen Planning Group Election,” and Board Policy I-1, “Planning and

Sponsor Group Policies and Procedures.”

RECOMMENDATION(S)

SUPERVISOR JIM DESMOND

Appoint Christi Knight to the COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ADMINISTERING

BOARD, Seat 5, for the term to expire January 4, 2027.

Appoint Brian Morales to the PARKS ADVISORY COMMITEE, SAN DIEGO COUNTY,

Seat 9, to complete the unexpired term, set to expire January 4, 2027.

Appoint Francesca Harris to the RAINBOW COMMUNITY PLANNING GROUP, Seat 5,

for a term to expire January 8, 2029.

Appoint Stuart Kuhn to the WARNER SPRINGS COMMUNITY SPONSOR GROUP, Seat 1,

to complete the unexpired term, set to expire January 8, 2029.

Appoint Dorothy Willis to the WARNER SPRINGS COMMUNITY SPONSOR GROUP, Seat

9, to complete the unexpired term, set to expire on January 8, 2029.

EQUITY IMPACT STATEMENT

County government includes standing and special citizen boards, commissions, committees, and

task forces formed to advise the Board of Supervisors and County staff on issues and policy and

to serve as links to the community. Boards, commissions, and committees provide an inter-

relationship between the residents and the government of the County. The nominations in this

Board Letter enable the County of San Diego to provide individual residents the opportunity to

impart valuable insight and input into the operation of the government.

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT STATEMENT

The County of San Diego has over one hundred boards, commissions, committees, and task

forces that serve as voice in the County government. Advisory bodies are an essential role in

resident engagement that allow citizens to participate on issues relating to the welfare and quality

of life in the County. They are fundamental to the County of San Diego’s ability to navigate

complex and dynamic policy challenges, are a conduit to the County Bureaucracy, and a broker

to community voice. This board letter supports the County of San Diego Sustainability Goal

No.1 by “encourage[ing] people and diverse stakeholders to partner and participate in decisions

that impact their lives and communities.”

FISCAL IMPACT

N/A

BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT

N/A

ACTION:

ON MOTION of Supervisor Montgomery Steppe, seconded by Supervisor Aguirre, the Board of

Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent.

AYES:

Aguirre, Anderson, Lawson-Remer, Montgomery Steppe, Desmond

13.

SUBJECT:

COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW

Board Policy A-72, Board of Supervisors Agenda and Related Process, authorizes the Clerk of

the Board to prepare a Communications Received for Board of Supervisors' Official Records.

Routine informational reports, which need to be brought to the attention of the Board of

Supervisors yet not requiring action, are listed on this document. Communications Received

documents are on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Board.

RECOMMENDATION(S)

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

Note and file.

EQUITY IMPACT STATEMENT

N/A

SUSTAINABILITY STATEMENT

This board letter is a list of documents received by the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and/or

Board of Supervisors from other entities, other county departments, the public, and internal

documents presented to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors or the Board of Supervisors. This

contributes to the overall sustainability of the county by engaging the community in meaningful

ways and promote an environment that provides equitable access opportunities for public

engagement.

FISCAL IMPACT

N/A

BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT

N/A

ACTION:

ON MOTION of Supervisor Montgomery Steppe, seconded by Supervisor Aguirre, the Board of

Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent.

AYES:

Aguirre, Anderson, Lawson-Remer, Montgomery Steppe, Desmond

14.

SUBJECT:

FIGHTING THE RISING COST OF LIVING BY OPPOSING NEW

TAXES (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW

This item was continued from the January 28, 2026 General Legislative and Land Use

Legislative Session.

San Diego County is one of the most desirable places to live in the country with its temperate

weather, vibrant economy, and beautiful landscape. 3.3 million people are lucky to call San

Diego County their home. However, many are being priced out by the high cost of living. Years

of mismanagement by the State of California, coupled with structural economic issues like the

housing shortage, are exacerbating the affordability crisis. Californians pay some of the highest

taxes in the country: state income and payroll taxes, sales taxes, property taxes, gas taxes, school

bonds, vehicle registration, and more. Working and middle-class families, young professionals,

seniors, and small businesses are being crushed by the cost of living and tremendous taxes they

pay.

The County of San Diego (County) has collected increasing, record amounts in property taxes

year after year. This was reflected in the County’s largest budget ever being adopted, totaling

$8.63 billion for Fiscal Year 2025-26 (FY). The County does not have a revenue problem, and

residents already pay exorbitant taxes. The County should actively oppose new and unnecessary

taxes.

The Documentary Transfer Tax (DTT), also known as the property transfer tax, is a tax on all

real estate transactions. It applies a tax of $0.55 per $500 on the sale price of property under state

law. This is typically a line item for real estate sales. For example, a property that sells for $1

million would have a DTT of $1,100. This default rate of $0.55 is set by state law. It can be

raised by a city or county through a ballot measure. Cities and counties that have raised this tax

have seen disastrous effects on their real estate markets and local economies. Raising the DTT

typically results in a sharp drop in real estate transactions, reduced development and

construction, and below expected revenue from the tax. Proposals to raise the statewide default

rate from $0.55 to $30.55 would result in a 5,455% increase of the DTT. If the tax rate was

increased 5,455%, the $1,100 one would pay on a $1 million home would suddenly become

$61,100. This would dramatically increase the price of not just single-family homes, but office

space, commercial space, and muti-family housing, which could have unintended consequences

on our local economy.

A proposal has also been made to change state laws to allow individual counties to collect

payroll taxes. Currently, counties cannot levy and collect payroll taxes. Payroll taxes are paid by

the employee and employer to the state and federal governments. Payroll taxes are a massive

overhead cost for businesses and raising these costs will make it harder for businesses not only to

hire new employees, but also to retain their existing workforce. Larger businesses may reconsider

operating in San Diego County, and small businesses will have harder time growing and staying

afloat.

The County of San Diego should oppose new and unnecessary taxes. The County has a healthy

revenue source that has continuously increased. Today’s action directs the Chief Administrative

Officer to add to the Legislative Program opposition to legislation that will increase the DTT and

the ability for counties to levy and collect payroll taxes.

RECOMMENDATION(S)

SUPERVISOR JIM DESMOND

1. Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to include in the Board’s Legislative Program

opposition to legislation that will change state law that would increase the current

Documentary Transfer Tax of fifty-five cents ($0.55) for each five hundred dollars

($500).

2. Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to include in the Board’s Legislative Program

opposition to legislation that will change state law to allow counties to levy and collect

payroll taxes.

EQUITY IMPACT STATEMENT

N/A

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT STATEMENT

N/A

FISCAL IMPACT

There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. There will be no change in net General

Fund cost and no additional staff years

BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT

N/A

ACTION:

ACTION 14.1:

A motion was made by Supervisor Desmond, seconded by Supervisor Anderson, for the Board of

Supervisors to take action as recommended.

(A substitute motion was introduced.)

ACTION 14.2:

ON MOTION of Supervisor Lawson-Remer, seconded by Supervisor Montgomery Steppe, the

Board of Supervisors took the following actions:

1. Directed the Chief Administrative Officer to add to the County’s Legislative Program

opposition to tax giveaways for the rich that shift costs onto low-income, working, and

middle-class county residents.

2. Directed the Chief Administrative Officer to add to the County’s Legislative Program to seek

State authority to ask voters to support new taxes on Californians that have benefited the most

from our economy: billionaires, global investors, out of state real estate speculators, large

corporations, and others who have amassed a disproportionate share of wealth, with those taxes

structured through progressive revenue strategies that level the playing field, so essential services

like 9-1-1 emergency response, healthcare, and clean air and water are not cut.

AYES: Aguirre, Lawson-Remer, Montgomery Steppe

NOES: Anderson

ABSTAIN: Desmond

AYES:

NOES:

Aguirre, Lawson-Remer, Montgomery Steppe

Anderson

ABSTAINED:Desmond

15.

SUBJECT:

PRESENTATION OF A SEMIQUINCENTENNIAL (250TH

ANNIVERSARY) CELEBRATION OF THE UNITED STATES

DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE AT WATERFRONT PARK

(DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW

San Diego County, the second largest county in California, is home to one of the most diverse

and civically engaged populations in the country and holds a unique place in the nation’s history.

The county also has the largest concentration of military personnel in the world who share with

the rest of our constituents a deep and enduring connection to the principles of democracy,

service, and equality that underpin the United States Declaration of Independence. As the nation

approaches the Semiquincentennial or 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, the

County of San Diego (County) is uniquely positioned to serve as a regional leader in

commemorating this historic milestone.

Today’s action requests Board authorization to hold a public Semiquincentennial Celebration on

July 4, 2026 at Waterfront Park to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the United States

Declaration of Independence. The proposed event would include the use of projection mapping

displays on the County Administrative Center and authorize vendor participation to support

event programming, public engagement, and community activation. Waterfront Park’s central

location and accessibility make it an ideal venue to host a large-scale, inclusive celebration that

reflects the County’s historical significance, military presence, and commitment to civic

participation.

The proposed celebration also presents a significant opportunity to collaborate with community

partners and Downtown San Diego stakeholders to enhance the event’s reach, impact, and

economic benefit. Potential sponsorships and partnerships may include, but are not limited to,

ACE Parking, San Diego Metropolitan Transit System, San Diego Padres and Ballpark Events,

Petco Park concessions and vendors, USS Midway Museum, Downtown San Diego Partnership,

Gaslamp Quarter Association, Little Italy Association of San Diego, Petco Park concert and

event entertainment companies, and the San Diego Tourism Authority. These collaborations

would support strengthening ties between the County and the broader downtown business and

cultural community.

Approval of this request will allow the County to commemorate a defining moment in the

nation’s history through an event that honors San Diego County’s role as a center of military

service, civic pride, and community partnership, while creating opportunities for public

engagement, local business participation, and regional collaboration.

RECOMMENDATION(S)

SUPERVISOR JOEL ANDERSON AND SUPERVISOR JIM DESMOND

1. Direct the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) to take the necessary actions to facilitate

and support the planning and implementation of a Semiquincentennial (250th

Anniversary) Celebration of the United States Declaration of Independence at Waterfront

Park, including coordination of site use, approval of projection mapping displays, and

authorization of vendor participation in support of the event.

2. Direct the CAO to foster partnerships and actively pursue sponsorships and collaborative

opportunities with, and accept donations from, public, private, and community

stakeholders, including downtown San Diego organizations, to support the planning,

programming, and execution of the Semi Quincentennial (250th Anniversary)

Celebration at Waterfront Park and to enhance public awareness, engagement, and

participation in the event.

EQUITY IMPACT STATEMENT

The Semiquincentennial Celebration at Waterfront Park is designed to be inclusive and

accessible for all San Diego County residents by ensuring free public admission, multilingual

materials, and ADA-compliant facilities. The event will actively engage small businesses and

vendors to promote economic equity, while programming will reflect the diverse cultural

contributions that shape our nation’s history.

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT STATEMENT

N/A

FISCAL IMPACT

Funds for the actions requested to collaborate and plan for a Semiquincentennial (250th

Anniversary) Celebration of the United States Declaration of Independence at Waterfront Park

are partially included in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 Operational Plan based on existing staff

time in the Department of Parks and Recreation and Department of General Services funded by

existing General Purpose Revenue and Charges for Services to support planning for the event.

There will be no change in net General Fund cost and no additional staff years.

Funds to support direct costs of the event, including vendors, equipment, and supplies, are not

included in the FY 2025-26 Operational Plan and will depend upon availability of sponsorships

and collaborative opportunities. At this time, there is no funding source budgeted to support

direct event costs and the event would not proceed without financial support from sponsorships

or reallocation of existing funding. Staff would return to the Board for any necessary actions to

accept sponsorships and/or appropriate identified funding as needed. There will be no change in

net General Fund cost and no additional staff years.

BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT

The County of San Diego (County) has a longstanding commitment to encouraging the

participation of large and small businesses in County contracting opportunities and recognizes

the vital role the local business community plays in supporting County initiatives. Approval of

this request provides an opportunity to further advance these efforts by facilitating vendor

participation at Waterfront Park, thereby expanding outreach and engagement while enhancing

access to economic opportunities for local businesses.

ACTION:

ON MOTION of Supervisor Aguirre, seconded by Supervisor Montgomery Steppe, the Board of

Supervisors took the following actions:

1. Directed the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) to take the necessary actions to facilitate

and support the planning and implementation of a Semiquincentennial (250th Anniversary)

Celebration of the United States Declaration of Independence at Waterfront Park, including

coordination of site use, approval of projection mapping displays, and authorization of vendor

participation in support of the event.

2. Directed the CAO to foster partnerships, actively pursue sponsorships and collaborative

opportunities, and accept donations from the public, private, and community stakeholders to

support the planning, programming, and execution of the Semiquincentennial Celebration of the

United States Declaration of Independence at Waterfront Park, and to enhance public awareness,

engagement, and participation in the event, subject to the following eligibility requirements.

a. The County shall accept sponsorships, donations, other financial contributions, or

partnerships only from organizations that demonstrate alignment with the County’s Strategic

Plan and the County’s values of inclusion, equal opportunity, and support for immigrant

communities, LGBTQ+ communities, tribal nations and indigenous groups, and other historically

underserved populations.

b. An organization may demonstrate alignment with the values with subsection (a) through one

or more of the following, as determined by the CAO:

i. Publicly stated policies, programs, or commitments supporting immigrants, refugees, or

mixed-status families, tribal nations and indigenous groups, and/or LGBTQ+ communities

ii. Workforce, community, or philanthropic initiatives that advance inclusion, equity, or access to

opportunity for historically underserved populations;

iii. Partnerships, grants, or investments supporting organizations or communities aligned with the

County’s equity and inclusion goals; or

iv. Other comparable actions or commitments consistent with the purpose and values highlighted

in the County’s strategic plan.

c. All organizations shall self-certify, in a form approved by the CAO, that they meet the

eligibility criteria set forth in this section

d. Notwithstanding an organization’s self-certification or demonstrated alignment, the CAO

retains discretion to decline any sponsorship, donation, financial contribution, or partnership that

is inconsistent with the purpose, intent, or values of the Celebration.

3. a. Directed the CAO to coordinate with the Office of Equity and Racial Justice (OERJ) and

the County’s Tribal Liaison to ensure that the planning and implementation of the

Semiquincentennial Celebration of the United States Declaration of Independence at Waterfront

Park:

i. Incorporates meaningful community engagement, with particular emphasis on tribal nations

and indigenous groups, immigrant communities and immigrant-serving organizations, LGBTQ+

communities, and other historically underserved populations

ii. Promotes broad and inclusive participation reflecting the diversity of San Diego County; and

iii. Is consistent with the County’s equity, inclusion, and racial justice goals.

b. Such coordination shall inform outreach strategies, program development, and partnership

activities associated with the Celebration.

AYES: Aguirre, Lawson-Remer, Montgomery Steppe

NOES: Anderson, Desmond

AYES:

NOES:

Aguirre, Lawson-Remer, Montgomery Steppe

Anderson, Desmond

16.

SUBJECT:

EMPLOYER AND EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION

RATES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW

California Government Code Section 31454 requires the Board of Supervisors to adjust the rates

of San Diego County’s employer and employee retirement contributions based on

recommendations of the San Diego County Employees Retirement Association (SDCERA)

Board of Trustees (Retirement Board). The Retirement Board approved the employer and

employee contribution rates recommended by its actuary, The Segal Group, Inc., for Fiscal Year

(FY) 2026-27 on November 20, 2025.

While the employer contribution rates are different for Safety and General members, the

aggregate employer rate (or weighted average rate) approved by the Retirement Board for FY

2026-27 is 38.00% of payroll, which is a decrease from the FY 2025-26 aggregate employer rate

of 48.16%, as anticipated in our long term financial planning. The decrease in the employer

contribution rate results most significantly from the effect of fully amortizing some of the

retirement fund’s Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) layers as well as from a larger

than expected projected total payroll and changes in actuarial assumptions adopted by the

Retirement Board, notably changes in demographic assumptions that effectively reduce cost.

The average employee (i.e. member) rate as a percentage of payroll decreased from 11.58% to

11.26%, primarily due to changes in active member demographics among retirement tiers and

changes in actuarial assumptions.

Approval of today’s recommendation would adopt employer and employee retirement

contribution rates for inclusion in the Chief Administrative Officer Recommended Operational

Plan (i.e. budget) for FY 2026-27.

RECOMMENDATION

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

Adopt the San Diego County employer and employee retirement contribution rates for Fiscal

Year 2026-27 as recommended by the San Diego County Employees Retirement Association

actuary and approved by the Retirement Board on November 20, 2025.

EQUITY IMPACT STATEMENT

Approval of this recommendation will implement the County of San Diego’s contribution rates

for the normal cost and Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability that will be funded in the Fiscal

Year 2026-27 Operational Plan to meet the County’s obligation to provide a defined benefit

pension plan for permanent employees. San Diego County Employees Retirement Association’s

retirement benefits support a broad community of diverse employees and retirees, providing

long-term financial support well after active employment with the County concludes.

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT STATEMENT

Benefits provided by a secure and stable retirement fund help ensure the County of San Diego

can compete to attract and retain an appropriately sized, skilled and diverse workforce to design

and implement policies, programs and services that ensure equitable and sustainable

opportunities.

FISCAL IMPACT

If the recommendation to adopt the rates of employer retirement contributions is approved, the

estimated total annual employer retirement contribution costs for the County of San Diego

(County) and all participating employers will be approximately $757.0 million for Fiscal Year

(FY) 2026-27, a decrease of approximately $139.3 million from the FY 2025-26 estimated total

employer contribution.

The County is obligated to fund approximately 94% of the total annual employer retirement

contribution, which is estimated at $711.6 million in FY 2026-27, a decrease of approximately

$131.0 million from the County’s share of estimated annual employer retirement contributions in

the prior fiscal year, which is included in the County’s long term financial planning. Other

participating employers are obligated to make the remaining 6% of contributions to the San

Diego County Employees Retirement Association (SDCERA). These employers include San

Diego Superior Court, San Dieguito River Valley Joint Powers Authority, Local Agency

Formation Commission and San Diego County Office of Education. The County’s actual cost of

retirement will differ from this estimate due to the application of the contribution rates to the

County’s actual biweekly payroll instead of the SDCERA actuary’s assumed payroll. The

funding source is a combination of program specific revenues and General Purpose Revenue. No

additional staff years are required.

BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT

N/A

ACTION:

ON MOTION of Supervisor Montgomery Steppe, seconded by Supervisor Aguirre, the Board of

Supervisors took action as recommended.

AYES:

Aguirre, Lawson-Remer, Montgomery Steppe, Desmond

NOT PRESENAnderson

17.

SUBJECT:

CLOSED SESSION (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW

A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION

(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9)

Robert Martinez, et al. v. Tri-Group Construction and Development Inc., et al.;

San Diego Superior Court Case No.: 37-2023-00035689-CU-PA-CTL

B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION

(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9)

Daniel Garcia v. County of San Diego;

San Diego Superior Court Case No.: 37-2024-00021805-CU-PA-CTL

C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION

(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9)

Darryl Dunsmore, et al. v. County of San Diego, et al.; United States District

Court, Southern District Case No. 20-cv-00406-AJB-WVG

D. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION

(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9)

Rowdy Pauu v. County of San Diego, et al.; United States District Court,

Southern District Case No. 23-cv-0961-TWR-SBC

E. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION

(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9)

Whitney Antrim v. County of San Diego, et al.;

San Diego Superior Court, Case No.: 37-2023-00016017-CU-WT-CTL

RECOMMENDATION(S)

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

At the direction of the Board.

EQUITY IMPACT STATEMENT

N/A

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT STATEMENT

N/A

FISCAL IMPACT

N/A

BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT

N/A

ACTION:

The Board of Supervisors met in closed session on February 10, 2026, from 4:06 p.m. to 4:44

p.m. Four Board members were present for Items 17A and 17B, with Chair Lawson-Remer

absent. All members were present for Items 17C and 17D. Chair Lawson-Remer and Vice Chair

Montgomery Steppe recused themselves from Item 17E. The Board took no reportable actions.

18.

SUBJECT:

NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMUNICATION (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW

Aaron Landau spoke in support of Supervisor Joel Anderson, commending his

bipartisan approach, accessibility to constituents, and long record of public

service, and expressed appreciation as a self-identified lifelong Democrat who

votes across party lines.

Gilbert Chavez requested that vacancies on the Spring Valley Community

Planning Group be filled expeditiously, noting he has applied, completed

required steps, and wishes to serve to improve neighborhood safety and quality

of life.

Allegedly Audra raised concerns about child trafficking and abuse, alleged

misconduct within child welfare and related agencies, and criticized elected

officials and institutions for failing to protect children and address alleged

pedophilia and exploitation.

Purita Javier described health impacts and anxiety related to emissions from a

ceramics kiln in her neighborhood, referenced involvement by County Health

and Human Services, and asked for continued assistance to protect community

health and safety.

Greg Sowizdrzal, President of IATSE Local 122, spoke in support of creating a

County film initiative, including a film commission, film office, and targeted

rebate program, to standardize permitting, retain film and television productions,

and increase local jobs and spending.

Steven Watson stated that his father, Minh Watson, died under court ordered

house arrest in San Diego, alleged the death was mishandled by law enforcement

and the Medical Examiner’s Office, and requested that the County take action

regarding his concerns.

Paul the Bold raised concerns about child welfare operations, called for an audit

of the Child and Family Well Being Department and related agencies, and

criticized potential governance reforms and comments by an outside policy

advocate.

Barbara Gordon recognized February as Heart Health Month and highlighted the

cardiovascular risks of smoking tobacco and marijuana, emphasizing research

on high blood pressure and urging stronger prevention and public education

efforts.

Truth criticized County leadership and communications strategies, referenced

environmental issues at the Tijuana River, raised concerns about animal services

practices and euthanasia decisions, and opposed extending supervisor term

limits.

Consuelo raised concerns about proclamations and governance reform, alleged

that County actions and proclamations are performative, criticized economic

conditions and cost of living, and asserted that residents are not truly free given

economic pressures.

Cesar Javier spoke regarding the Tijuana River pollution, the Air Pollution

Control District, and collaboration between City and County officials.

Mark spoke regarding artificial intelligence, digital identity, and global

governance concerns.

Madison Rapp spoke regarding cannabis impaired driving and public safety.

Peggy Walker spoke regarding public health impacts of marijuana and recent

media attention to those impacts.

Andrea Ebbing spoke regarding criminal justice, victim services, and alleged

corruption.

Justin Castro spoke regarding technology, nongovernmental organizations, and

perceptions regarding elections and representation.

RECOMMENDATION(S)

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

Heard, referred to the Chief Administrative Officer.

EQUITY IMPACT STATEMENT

N/A

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT STATEMENT

N/A

FISCAL IMPACT

N/A

BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT

N/A

ACTION:

Heard, Referred to the Chief Administrative Officer

The Board recessed at 4:44 p.m., until Wednesday, February 11, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. for the Land Use

Legislative Session.

ANDREW POTTER

Clerk of the Board of Supervisors

County of San Diego, State of California

Consent: Vizcarra

Discussion: Zurita

NOTE: This Statement of Proceedings sets forth all actions taken by the County of San Diego Board of

Supervisors on the matters stated, but not necessarily the chronological sequence in which the matters